Ika here.

Two clocks are ticking simultaneously - and neither waits for the other.

In Islamabad, JD Vance is wheels-down for a second round of US-Iran talks as the ceasefire expires Wednesday. Tehran hasn't confirmed it will even show up. Iran attacked commercial vessels Saturday after the US refused to lift its Hormuz blockade. The Strait - the jugular vein of global oil supply - has seen vessel transits collapse to their lowest since the blockade began.

In Washington, Kevin Warsh has sat before the Senate Banking Committee Tuesday for what may be the only public interrogation of the man poised to run the world's most powerful central bank. He enters trailing a paper trail of institutional critique, a hawkish record, and a president who wants rates cut - now.

And in London, Keir Starmer is fighting for his political life — not from the opposition benches, but from his own party. The Peter Mandelson vetting scandal has metastasized into something far more dangerous: a credibility crisis at the heart of the British state.

The ceasefire ends Wednesday. Trump says extending it is "highly unlikely."

The US delegation — Vance, special envoy Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner - is in Islamabad. Iran has not confirmed it will send negotiators. Tehran's state news agency called US demands "unreasonable and unrealistic." Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian posted on X that his country faces "deep historical mistrust" toward Washington and that "Iranians do not submit to force."

Trump, simultaneously, told the New York Post he was optimistic. "The concept of the deal is done," he said. Then threatened to destroy every power plant and bridge in Iran if talks collapse.

The gap between those two positions is not rhetorical. It's operational.

Iran attacked commercial vessels Saturday after re-closing the Strait of Hormuz - hours after Trump expressed confidence a deal was imminent. The US seized an Iranian cargo ship, the Touska, in the Gulf of Oman. Iran's armed forces said they were prepared to retaliate, but held back because civilians were on board.

Maersk - the world's second-largest container shipper - told customers the situation was "deeply dynamic, with full maritime certainty not assured." Vessel transits through Hormuz on Sunday dropped to their lowest point since the blockade started.

Why it matters: Over 20% of global oil flows through the Strait. Oil hit $95 a barrel Monday. The longer the blockade holds, the deeper inflation embeds - and the harder the Fed's job becomes.

The FT's Alan Beattie put it plainly: decades of sanctions mean Iran is only weakly attached to the global economy. The dislocation hurts Washington more than Tehran.

Kevin Warsh wants to reshape the Fed. The Iran war may reshape him first.

Tuesday's Senate Banking Committee hearing was likely the only public forum where Warsh faced direct questioning before his confirmation.

Warsh plans to tell senators that presidential pressure on the Fed is not, by itself, a threat to central bank independence — framing Trump's rate demands as opinion, not interference. He wants the Fed to "stay in its lane," pulling back from fiscal and social policy overreach.

That framing is politically elegant. Whether it's operationally sustainable is another question.

His reform agenda is ambitious. He wants to kill the dot plots - the quarterly rate projections that he argues trap policymakers in their own forecasts. He wants fewer Fed speeches, less forward guidance, more deliberate silence. He wants to shrink the Fed's $6.7 trillion balance sheet, arguing it gives the central bank an outsized grip on financial markets.

Former Fed vice-chair Don Kohn - who worked alongside Warsh during the 2008 crisis - offered the sharpest read on what comes next: "Logically, Trump would give him some room... But logic doesn't always prevail on Truth Social."

The political math is treacherous. Republican Senator Thom Tillis has said he will block Warsh's confirmation from reaching the Senate floor until the criminal probe against current chair Jay Powell is dropped. Powell has said he'll stay on as acting chair until Warsh wins a majority. Trump last week threatened to fire Powell if he didn't leave "on time."

Markets see less than a 50% chance of even a single quarter-point cut this year. That is not the monetary policy Trump demanded.

The bottom line: Warsh is talented, credentialed, and walking into the worst possible macro environment for a new Fed chair. The Iran war has already made his first rate decision for him: hold. Trump won't like it.

The UK prime minister didn't just make a bad appointment. He ignored the written warning telling him not to.

Peter Mandelson - Labour grandee, Brexit opponent, operator of a lobbying firm with three Chinese clients including Shein, TikTok, and a pharmaceutical company with ties to Beijing - failed his national security vetting check. He was appointed Britain's ambassador to Washington anyway. Starmer sacked him last September. Now the cover-up is eating up the government.

Here's what makes this worse than a garden-variety scandal.

Documents released by the Cabinet Office show that the then head of the civil service, Lord Simon Case, wrote to Starmer in November 2024 - before Mandelson's appointment was announced - laying out the process explicitly: submit the name first, run the vetting, confirm the appointment only after clearances are obtained and conflicts of interest reviewed.

Starmer announced Mandelson in December 2024. The vetting came after.

His national security adviser, Jonathan Powell, reportedly described the appointment as "weirdly rushed." Mandelson failed the check. Sir Olly Robbins, the Foreign Office's most senior civil servant, granted clearance anyway - and, Starmer now claims, deliberately concealed the red flags from both the prime minister and parliament.

Starmer sacked Robbins last week. Robbins is seeking legal advice.

The Commons was brutal. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said Starmer had "thrown his staff and officials under the bus" and that he hadn't asked harder questions because he "didn't want to know." Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey called it a "catastrophic error of judgment" and demanded resignation. Even Labour MPs - silent, sullen - offered no applause.

Starmer's own words compounded the damage.

The chamber broke into mocking laughter.

Former civil service head Lord Gus O'Donnell wrote in The Times that Starmer now faced "one of the worst crises in relations between ministers and mandarins of modern times," warning that Robbins' dismissal risked "a serious and sustained chilling effect on serving and prospective civil servants."

Tom Fletcher, UN humanitarian chief and Robbins ally, told the BBC his friend was "heartbroken" - and that public service was "stitched into his DNA."

The bottom line: Starmer survives - for now. Labour won't move against him before May 7 local elections. But the documents aren't fully released yet. The wound is open. And it's self-inflicted.

This is a private newsletter, if you’d like a colleague added, please reach out with their email.

If you’d like to support the work, there are several options. Cancel anytime.